Want to go further?
Explore the full FAQ hub in our campaign:
The EU Pay Transparency Directive requires employers to report both unadjusted and adjusted gender pay gaps. These two figures tell different but complementary stories:
Together, they show both the size of the gap and what might be driving it.
Unadjusted gender pay gap: The raw average difference in gross pay between men and women, regardless of role or seniority. A high-level snapshot of gender equality.
Adjusted gender pay gap: Goes deeper by factoring in variables such as:
The aim is to show the “unexplained” portion of the gap, which can highlight inequality or bias.
Statistical methods:
The Directive suggests using the Oaxaca-Blinder method, which splits results into “explained” and “unexplained” parts. In practice, most organisations will use regression analysis or simpler tools, often with support from external providers.
Reporting requirements include:
If gaps of 5% or more can’t be justified, employers must:
Calculating pay gaps isn’t just a compliance exercise. To get credible results, you’ll need to:
Small sample sizes, inconsistent titles, or missing data can skew results, so preparing your systems now will make compliance smoother later.
The gender pay gap is more than a statistic. Done properly, analysis helps organisations spot hidden inequities, strengthen their pay frameworks, and build a reputation for fairness.
It’s not just about meeting a deadline - it’s about using data to create a more equitable workplace.