1. Home>
  2. Resources>
  3. Payroll & Benefits>
Pay gap reporting

What’s the minimum sample size for pay gap reporting, and what if we don’t meet it?

At a glance

The Directive doesn’t set a hard minimum group size for pay reporting. But the general principle is clear: avoid reporting on groups so small that individual employees could be identified.

If a category of workers is too small, you’ll need to aggregate it with others or apply privacy protections.
 

    Let’s break it down

    There’s no single EU-wide rule for minimum group size. Instead, employers are expected to apply good judgement and align with broader data protection principles (such as GDPR).

    Common guidance includes:

    • Avoid publishing data for groups with fewer than 3–5 people.
    • Aggregate small groups into broader job families or categories.
    • Use anonymisation techniques (e.g. masking or rounding figures).

    When employees request pay comparisons:

    Even if formal reporting isn’t possible for small groups, employees may still ask for average pay levels. In those cases, employers should:

    • Share aggregated averages, never individual salaries.
    • Be transparent about why some data is withheld.
    • Explain how pay relates to established salary bands.

    Other considerations:

    • Small samples can create volatility in results, making gaps look larger or smaller than they really are.
    • Using rolling averages or multi-year comparisons can help smooth out spikes. Small sample sizes can also create volatility, where gaps appear artificially larger or smaller depending on current staffing. Smoothing techniques can help provide a truer picture
    • Relying on employee “consent” to share pay data isn’t a safe solution - under EU law, consent in the employer–employee relationship isn’t usually considered valid.
       

      What this means in practice

      To manage this, employers should:

      • Define clear minimum thresholds for reporting.
      • Build aggregation and anonymisation techniques into reporting systems.
      • Prepare managers to explain why some information can’t be shared, without undermining employee trust.
         

        Why it matters

        Protecting privacy while delivering transparency is a delicate balance. Handling small groups carefully ensures your reporting is credible and compliant — without exposing individual pay data.

        Done right, this balance reassures employees that pay transparency is about fairness, not exposure.
         

          For more insights, explore the full FAQ hub in our campaign:

            Let’s Talk Pay Transparency. We Make It Make Sense.