Two-thirds of employers believe they offer fair compensation.
42% of employees feel their own salary is fair compared to colleagues in similar roles.
Source: SD Worx HR & Payroll Pulse 2025
If you ask employees how they feel about their pay, you’ll rarely hear: “It’s perfect.”
And that’s not surprising. In organisations across Europe, most people believe they’re underpaid, even when their salary is above the market rate. And while pay rises can create a short-lived sense of progress, the satisfaction often fades fast. So the real question is: can pay actually motivate people, and if so, how?
According to our HR & Payroll Pulse Europe 2025 report, around two-thirds of employers believe they offer fair compensation. Yet employees see things differently. Only 42% feel their salary is fair compared to others in similar roles, and just one in three believe pay practices in their organisation are transparent.
This gap in perception highlights a growing tension. Employees are not just questioning what they earn, but how those decisions are made. What’s being rewarded? What isn’t? And do any of these decisions feel fair?
The answers often lie not in the numbers, but in the structure, transparency and intent behind your reward strategy.
Two-thirds of employers believe they offer fair compensation.
42% of employees feel their own salary is fair compared to colleagues in similar roles.
Source: SD Worx HR & Payroll Pulse 2025
Pay is undeniably important. It’s the baseline for financial security and a key factor in job decisions. But it doesn’t automatically lead to engagement. In fact, when financial rewards are overused or misapplied, they can sometimes reduce motivation instead of increasing it.
That’s because pay interacts with intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in complex ways. If people feel fairly compensated, they’re free to focus on the purpose and enjoyment of their work. But if they feel underpaid, undervalued or unsure about how pay is determined, their attention shifts. Doubt creeps in. Distrust grows.
One useful framework for understanding this is Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory. It suggests that certain factors cause job satisfaction (motivators), while others prevent dissatisfaction (hygiene factors). Pay falls into the second category: a hygiene factor. That means poor pay can cause disengagement, but improving pay on its own won’t necessarily create motivation.
However, that doesn’t mean pay is powerless. When thoughtfully designed, a reward strategy can reinforce what your organisation values, build trust and support a culture where people feel motivated to contribute.
So, can pay drive performance? Yes, but it depends how it’s used.
People are motivated when they feel fairly treated, clearly guided and emotionally connected to their work. If pay can reinforce those conditions, it becomes more than a transaction. It becomes a signal of trust and respect.
That doesn’t mean offering more and more money, necessarily. It means aligning reward with purpose and making sure people understand how decisions are made.
Let’s explore what makes pay motivating, and what undermines its impact:
A motivational reward strategy isn’t about spending more. It’s about designing with purpose. The most effective reward policies share a few key features:
Clarity – Employees know what behaviours and results are being rewarded, and why.
Transparency – The process behind pay decisions is explainable and fair.
Flexibility – Different people value different things. Offer a degree of choice.
Line of sight – There is a clear connection between individual performance and reward.
Recognition mix – Financial rewards are paired with non-financial signals of appreciation and growth.
Together, these factors turn pay into a meaningful driver of motivation, rather than just a cost.
Even well-meaning policies can miss the mark. Common pitfalls include:
One of the most overlooked parts of any reward strategy is communication. People experience pay through conversations, not spreadsheets.
That makes managers central to the success of your approach. A skilled manager can explain reward decisions with empathy, clarity and confidence. They help employees understand what was decided, why it matters and how they can grow.
An unprepared manager, on the other hand, can create confusion or mistrust, even when the underlying policy is sound. That’s why investing in manager training isn’t a ‘nice-to-have’. In fact, it’s essential to making your reward strategy real.
Pay on its own won’t transform a disengaged workforce. But when reward is fair, transparent and aligned with your values, it becomes a powerful asset. It reinforces trust, it motivates performance, and it helps create a culture where people know they matter.
In the end, it’s not just how much you pay. It’s how well your reward strategy communicates what you stand for.
Looking for the bigger picture? The full HR & Payroll Pulse Europe 2025 report explores how trust, pay, careers and technology are reshaping the HR agenda across Europe.