1. Home>
  2. Resources>
  3. Payroll & Benefits>
Woman shopping in a clothes store

HR Insights: HR’s case for European pay alternatives

Interview with Nils De Bremaeker, CFO of WorxInvest on HR payments

Nils de Bremaeker

 

Europe is facing a growing dilemma in its payment systems. The Financial Times recently published that nearly two-thirds of card transactions across the continent rely on U.S. payment networks – primarily Visa and Mastercard.  

Although this dependence may initially simply seem convenient, rising geopolitical tensions indicate potential strategic risks and reinforce the need for a stronger European alternative. 

To look deeper into this dilemma, we sat down with Nils De Bremaeker, Chief Financial Officer at WorxInvest, the parent company of SD Worx and host of HR Pay Solutions. 

HR Pay Solutions, hosted by WorxInvest, is a smart finance and payment platform for HR teams. Integrated with SD Worx payroll and benefits systems, it helps organisations manage workforce-related payments. 

    What are the potential risks of American payment network dependency?

    Amongst geopolitical tensions at the start of 2026, experts have warned that Europe’s reliance on non-European payment schemes could leave us vulnerable if global relations were to deteriorate.  

    Nils explains, “Visa and Mastercard continue to grow their market share of payments year after year, partly because many of the payment systems and hardware used by merchants in Europe are American.  

    “This makes them extremely dominant today. They are also relatively expensive. It ultimately raises the question: will America always remain a reliable partner? In theory, the U.S. could halt payment traffic in Europe by disabling Visa or Mastercard cards.” 

    “This would be a true ‘black swan’ scenario.” 

    Although this hypothetical scenario may seem extreme, payment systems are critical strategic infrastructure. This dependency is important to address as Europe currently lacks a strong, unified solution. 

      Why is Europe struggling to build its own payment variants?

      Although a European alternative sounds good in theory, a payment system that works hasn’t been built yet.  

      Nils continues, “The issue we have is that everyone wants something ‘European’, but then each country mostly wants what benefits its own nation. For instance, each country wants its own card scheme; in France you have Carte Bancaire, in Germany girocard.” 

      “That’s why there isn’t really something unified. They’d rather have an American solution than a German system. There are several smaller initiatives, such as Wero, the planned successor to Payconiq, that are attempting pan-European reach, but this adoption has still been limited as it still remains an account 2 account system which only works between the participating banks, it has no card scheme yet.” 

      Additionally, the digital euro that the ECB plans to launch in 2029 will not be able to replace American card schemes, as the maximum amount of digital euros per citizen will likely be capped at a low level. Essentially, what we find is that many in Europe share this ambition, but scale and coordination are acting as barriers in developing a successful alternative.  

        Taking a pragmatic approach

        Despite this ambition, Nils emphasises the need for a reality check. Although European alternatives are promising, it wouldn’t be practical for businesses to abandon existing global networks. 

        “For the time being, we will almost certainly partner with Visa and Mastercard simply because the reach and acceptance are unmatched.” 

        “So, while from a progress perspective we will use American payment systems, I still think it’s good that a European alternative is coming. It will just take a lot of time before it’s strong enough.” 

          The value of smooth HR payments and cards

          When you step back from consumer payments, it becomes clear how much more nuanced the situation is in HR. Companies must manage multiple types of payments each month, ranging from contractors and benefits to reimbursements and cross-border payments.  

          For employers, this is where complexity and regulations can take the debate from theory to practice. 

          Nils says, “Clients abroad are not used to giving money to payroll providers. However, international payments are in high demand. For example, companies with headquarters in Belgium but small teams abroad and no finance departments want compliance – so HR Pay should serve that too. As we developed HR Pay, it became very clear that we need to shift toward flexible benefits and pay.” 
           
          A modern HR payment solution must be compliant and easy to manage, particularly in a Europe that lacks a unified payment network. Platforms like HR Pay Solutions are designed to help employers navigate these issues by providing the operational infrastructure to handle multiple payment types and cross-border compliance. 

            Turning challenge into opportunity

            Nils’ insights make it clear that Europe has the ambition to build its own payment alternatives, but the road to a unified, widely accepted local payment system will take time. 

            In the meantime, employers can take control today by adopting solutions that simplify HR payments, ensure compliance, and support cross-border teams.